EXAMPLE DELIVERABLE · SYNTHETIC DATA
A finding your team
can investigate.
This sample illustrates the structure of a reconciliation diagnostic. It is not a customer result, a measurement of savings or evidence that funds moved.
Order 4471 — totals disagree
Question: does the recorded payment capture match the confirmed order total?
01 / Supplied observations
| Source | Record | Operation | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Order system export | Order 4471, revision 1 | order_total | EUR 120.00 |
| Payment provider export | Capture cap-4471-a | payment_captured | EUR 110.00 |
02 / Finding
PAYMENT_TOTAL_MISMATCH
The supplied capture is €10.00 below the supplied order total for this revision. The records do not establish whether a second capture, later adjustment or revised order exists.
03 / Suggested investigation
- Confirm the order revision and the intended total at payment time.
- Check the provider history for other captures or subsequent adjustments.
- Verify export boundaries and event delivery before changing any financial record.
04 / Evidence & scope
Comparison: 12,000 − 11,000 = 1,000 EUR minor units. Two supplied observations; no bank statement, settlement verification or independent provider lookup. The difference is not automatically lost revenue.
In a scoped engagement: findings link to the supplied record identifiers and agreed checks. The handover includes the discrepancy report, supporting records, evidence export and a review session.
LET’S TALK ABOUT YOUR FLOW
Bring us the discrepancy.
Describe the systems involved and what does not add up. We will confirm the scope, required records and fixed price before work begins.